Yoo Hee-yeol, a YouTuber who raised suspicions of plagiarism, refutes IU’s controversy | KCelebs

Amid suspicions of plagiarism in opposition to IU, a YouTuber’s declare is attracting consideration.

It’s identified that YouTuber Gachi, who beforehand raised suspicions of plagiarism in opposition to composer Yoo Hee-yeol, was concerned within the music business. IU’s plagiarism suspicion is “nonsense”.


On Could 11, a video about IU’s plagiarism suspicion was posted on the ‘Gachi Okay-pop’ channel.

Worth Okay-pop defined why IU’s controversy was unreasonable from a musical standpoint, and mentioned the incident.

IU’s songs which have been accused of plagiarism are ‘Purple Sneakers’, ‘Good Day’, ‘Pippi’, ‘Poor’, ‘Boo’, and ‘Superstar’.

worth is “Within the case of ‘Pippi’ and ‘Poor’, the ambiance, choreography and styling of the songs are comparable. So, are you utilizing what already exists or creating one thing new? In ‘Pitiful’, I discovered that Nell’s melody and be aware overlapped one or two strains. It is like enjoying the identical image discover recreation.


For different songs, the worth is analogous, however defined that it’s inside the vary of reference. They mentioned the issue wasn’t with the reference itself.

worth is “‘Boo’ has a improvement just like the earlier tune. I feel I introduced that half. Nonetheless, this half might be seen inside the scope of reference.

Yoo Hee-yeol additionally talked about the worth, however the purpose for the plagiarism controversy was that Yoo Hee-yeol mentioned,I did not make any feedback.” He additionally famous that whereas Price had issues with ‘Purple Sneakers’, ‘Good Day’ and ‘Superstar’, it was not an issue amongst composers.


worth is “For reference, the chords are wonderful, however making the melodies too comparable is harmful. I feel there’s a drawback with ‘Good Day’ as a result of the melodies are comparable.

Nonetheless, the worth is that if there’s a actually absurd purpose for this incident, “IU participated in composing just for ‘Superstar’. IU and 5 others participated within the composition of this tune, and there was a separate composer answerable for your entire composition..”

Worth mentioned that IU needs to be held extra liable for the general composition than IU, who’s a singer and the sufferer of the tune in query.


Gachi added:IU is able to purchase the tune and sing it. It’s absurd to demand a place from the sufferer singer who obtained the tune in query. Why blame IU for this accountability?

Lastly, the worthIt looks like a lawsuit is occurring with IU because the goal. It seems to be just like the attorneys have discovered the logic to sue the topic..”

Supply: Nate.

Source link

Check Also

Maamla Legal Hai, Sunflower Season 2, Shōgun and More: New OTT Releases for Weekend Binge-Watch

Maamla Legal Hai, Sunflower Season 2, Shōgun and More: New OTT Releases for Weekend Binge-Watch

For this week’s new OTT launch suggestions, we now have a comic book courtroom drama, …